Case Study: Two‑Shift On‑Call Scheduling to Reduce SRE Burnout
srecase-studywellbeingon-call

Case Study: Two‑Shift On‑Call Scheduling to Reduce SRE Burnout

UUnknown
2026-01-04
8 min read
Advertisement

We partnered with a mid-size SaaS company to test a two-shift on-call model. The results: better coverage, fewer escalations, and measurable wellbeing improvements.

Case Study: Two‑Shift On‑Call Scheduling to Reduce SRE Burnout

Hook: On-call rotations are a double-edged sword. A carefully structured two-shift model can preserve service coverage while protecting team wellbeing — and we have the data to prove it.

Background

A SaaS platform with 60 engineers faced rising attrition due to irregular on-call patterns. We piloted a two-shift schedule over 12 weeks and measured MTTR, escalation counts and self-reported wellbeing.

Design Principles

  • Shorter shifts to reduce continuous sleep disruption
  • Overlap windows for handoffs with clear playbooks
  • Dedicated async documentation time for knowledge transfer

Operational Details

The two-shift model split coverage into an early and late shift with a structured handoff. Handovers used templates and a lightweight incident log. We borrowed scheduling lessons from broadcast case work — see a similar scheduling case study in a different domain at Case Study: Two-Shift Show Scheduling to Maximize Live Coverage and Host Wellbeing.

Outcomes (12 Weeks)

  • MTTR decreased by 18% compared to the previous quarter
  • Escalation volume fell by 22%
  • Self-reported burnout symptoms dropped by 28% on weekly surveys

Why It Worked

Key success factors were predictable handoffs, dedicated overlap, and explicit on-call return-to-work policies. We also integrated restorative practices for on-call teammates — short yoga or light routines, as recommended in wellness pieces such as Restorative Practices for Creatives.

Implementation Checklist

  1. Create a 4-week pilot and baseline your metrics.
  2. Establish a handoff template and incident mini-retros.
  3. Schedule overlap windows and designate a small escalation team.
  4. Offer a wellbeing budget (therapy, light practices) during pilot.

Common Risks & Mitigations

Risk: knowledge gaps across shifts. Mitigation: short handoff recordings and a searchable incident index. Risk: shift envy or perceived unfairness. Mitigation: transparent scheduling rules and rotation fairness checks.

“Design for human rhythms — predictable schedules give engineers back control and improve performance.”

Cross-Industry Lessons

Scheduling experiments in other sectors, like radio and hospitality, show similar wellbeing benefits when shifts are predictable and overlaps are explicit — see the radio scheduling case study referenced earlier (Two-Shift Show Scheduling).

Conclusions

Two-shift on-call models can reduce burnout and improve incident response when implemented with structured handoffs, overlap windows and wellbeing support. Pilot, measure, adapt.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#sre#case-study#wellbeing#on-call
U

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-26T04:17:26.767Z